Most Americans are somewhat clued in to the big exam approaching in a couple of weeks. Well, not exam exactly.
A co-worker and I were discussing the number of times we’ve voted (for president) in our lifetimes. It’s not many. I don’t necessarily feel compelled to exercise this freedom, particularly this year. As we discussed this, I realized that the few times I’ve voted there have been a number of other issues on the ballot (surprise!). This is when I begin to run into problems. It’s a personal problem, but I imagine many others experience similar issues. I treat it like an exam. I feel like I have to answer all the questions, and worse, I have to get the answer right. See, that’s the problem. Many people feel compelled to pick a choice on this multiple-guess exam simply because a choice is presented. That’s not always the case, as election results show many more votes for president than for governor than for legislator, etc. for a particular precinct. And that’s good. But how many votes are actually cast in good judgement?
So much energy, time, attention, and of course, money is expended to focus us on the national election that there is little ever said about the other issues on the ballot. I understand why. But I don’t agree with it, particularly because this country still uses an archaic system that allows people to vote on our behalf. The main problem is that these people are not apportioned in direct representation of the distribution of political affiliation (due to congressional district mapping, state laws concerning the casting of electoral votes, and of course, the fact that there is a Senate full of representatives– with respective electors– that are present not based on political distribution, etc.), and second to that is the fact that they don’t necessarily vote in the way they say they will. In fact, 158 times they have not done so (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector). Essentially, the system used to elect the president is set up such that not a single person in the entire country has to cast a vote to elect a president. Our electors will do it for us, even if the populace disagrees, as they have done on 3 occasions.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)#Contemporary_conflict_over_the_Electoral_College)
How much have I heard about local issues on the upcoming ballot? Basically, zip. Another coworker informed me that our governor is up for election. That doesn’t come as a surprise, but until he said that, I had not heard a peep from anyone about the gubernatorial election. I haven’t seen a sign in a yard, heard an ad on the radio, nothing. And state legislators? Again, nothing. School board members? I have seen a few signs for a lady I know. Other than that, the local media, paper and radio included, have included almost nothing on local elections. They carry plenty of opinion on the national election, but none of the local candidates have been on the radio in any way. Not only is this disappointing, I think it’s irresponsible of the media. The local issues will have as much, if not considerably more, effect on my day to day life. But the information to make an informed vote is difficult to obtain.
Some would say I should ‘get informed’. Fair enough. I should be making an effort. However, if there is little information available, and hosting debates for local candidates is not a local media priority, where do I obtain the information? I suppose the candidates may have websites, but largely those websites are composed of typical political rhetoric. Point being– it’s disappointing to want to be a responsible voter, but doing the legwork myself is impossible. I have a job. Media has a job. Enough said.
I am over 18. I’m not a felon. That gives me the right to vote. That also gives everyone else fitting the criteria the right to vote. That doesn’t mean that I should, and by extension, that doesn’t mean that anyone else should either. Call me a commie, but I guess I’m spreading the message– don’t get out the vote. At least not until the legwork has been done.